Function<Lisp, Java>

If you read the last blog post through the eyes of a Java developer, you may wonder exactly how you toss functions around willy-nilly like we did for our implementation of map. You can’t pass functions around like they’re values in Java! This is ridiculous. Someone call a lawyer.

Well, hold on, give me a second to explain. First of all, here’s map again, for your viewing pleasure:

List.map (f) = if this.isEmpty
                   then []
                   else f(this.head) : this.map(f, this.tail)

So we have a class called List with a method called map. It takes one parameter, f, and does some cool stuff. So first of all, let’s rephrase this in Java. We’ll call it FunctionalList so we don’t clash with the java.util.List interface.

class FunctionalList<T> {
    ...

    public <U> FunctionalList<U> map(function f) {
        return isEmpty()
                   ? nil()
                   : cons(f(head()), map(f, tail()));
    }
}

map takes a function that transforms an object, and applies it to every element of a list. So if that function takes an object of type T and gives us an object of type U, the resulting list will be FunctionalList<U>. The only thing we’re really missing is a type for f.

Consider f’s type for a moment. It takes an object of one type and returns an object of another. Well, we can encapsulate that in an interface.

interface Function<I, O> { }

It needs something more though. A way to apply the function itself.

interface Function<I, O> {
    O apply(I input);
}

It’s really as simple as that. That’s the type of our function. Because it’s wrapped in an interface, we can toss it around just like any other object. We just need to change map a little to accommodate it:

    public <U> FunctionalList<U> map(Function<T, U> f) {
        return isEmpty()
                   ? nil()
                   : cons(f.apply(head()), map(f, tail()));
    }

C# developers should be nodding their heads at this point. This is exactly how the Func<A, B> interface works. There’s more syntactic sugar around that one, but apart from that, it’s essentially the same idea.

So what does our multiply_by_two function look like under these circumstances? A little something like this:

multiplyByTwo(FunctionalList<Integer> list) {
    return list.map(new Function<Integer, Integer>() {
        Integer apply(Integer input) {
            return input * 2;
        }
    });
}

A bit messy, but it does the job well. Java’s anonymous implementations are unfortunately pretty verbose. That said, Java 8 is looking to change all of that with lambdas that will look something like the C# counterparts:

multiplyByTwo(FunctionalList<Integer> list) {
    return list.map(x => x * 2);
}

Until then, we’re stuck with the ugly implementation. I like to pull the implementation out into a method or constant and put it at the bottom of the class. That way, the function gets a decent name and it doesn’t bloat the code.

multiplyListItemsByTwo(FunctionalList<Integer> list) {
    return list.map(multiplyByTwo);
}

...

Function<Integer, Integer> multiplyByTwo = new Function<Integer, Integer>() {
        Integer apply(Integer input) {
            return input * 2;
        }
    });

Look at that. Functional programming for Java developers. Did you ever think you’d see the day?